The Nye/ Ham Debate and Why Christians Should be Disappointed


The Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham Debate last night has been viewed over 740,000 times so far on YouTube, so clearly people have a dog in this fight. Asserting that the creation/ evolution debate stirs people up is quite the understatement, but this debate brings two well-known individuals together. Bill Nye really needs no introduction if you were around in the 1990s, since his show “Bill Nye the Science Guy” was shown in classrooms all across the country. Ken Ham, the president of Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum, has a strong following as well.

So, when I heard these two were going to debate creation and evolution, I was disappointed -disappointed because of the lack of perspectives present. Nye advocates a science-first position, one that diametrically opposes creationism; especially young-earth creationism. Ham, on the other hand, forwards a position that the earth is 6,000 years old and teaches a Genesis-as-history position. While I am glad to have Bill Nye as a part of this debate, I wish that there would have been a scientific expert present. I feel as though an astrophysicist with a PhD would have been a stronger choice (though his/ her mainstream appeal would be greatly less that of Nye). Similarly, having Ken Ham there is all fine, but I would have also preferred a Christian who believes in evolution or at least an old-earth creationist.

The viewpoint presented by the “token Christian guy” in this debate is regrettably the minority position amongst Christian intellectuals. Having a theistic evolutionist, or someone with a PhD in biblical archeology would have been more enlightening than simply Ham. Ham is a seasoned debater and someone who has devoted his life to seeking to provide a biblically-based response to many of science’s critiques of Christianity. However, as Nye rightly points out, there are many Christians that have a strong faith that do not share Ham’s chronology of the universe. Having their perspectives present in this debate would have contributed greatly to the question of whether or not creation can function in a scientific world.

Now, I must state that I wanted to applaud Ham for his position that the scientific community at large serves a belief system of naturalism. There is a strong power dynamic within the scientific community to safeguard and monopolize scientific reasoning by saying that religion and science cannot co-exist (religion is also equally culpable in this regard). However, Ham’s attacks against “scientism” are exaggerated as well. To say that only young-earth creationists should be teaching science to our young people is just irresponsible. Overall this debate engages many of the major disputes of creationists-evolutionists, but there remains a decided lack of representation by other viewpoints.

I must weigh-in personally now. As one who is working on a PhD in Theology while having a bachelor’s in biology from Ohio State, I have heard many of the arguments from this debate before. I will say that while I personally am not convinced that a young earth model of creation lines up with scientific data, I do hold to creationism. I feel that God created the cosmos. I also feel that it’s possible that God allowed evolution to happen. I think at the end of the day, however, it doesn’t really matter because the message to Christians in the Bible is Jesus and the salvation He brings, not the minutiae of species variegation. I think that when people wish to engage in the creation/ evolution or religion/science debate, they need to remember that science and religion are not necessarily opposites.

For a great perspective on the Nye/ Ham debate, see Peter Enns’s blog:

3 thoughts on “The Nye/ Ham Debate and Why Christians Should be Disappointed

  1. Consider that the 7+ billion people on our planet today came from one man Adam. According to the Bible that is what happened. The Biblical story line is confirmed with two genealogies in the New Testament which chronicle man’s existence on the planet. God placed man on the planet earth and there were no intermediate steps. It is because of the unrepentant heart of man that refuses to acknowledge his Creator.

    Ro 1:21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.
    Ro 1:22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools
    Ro 1:23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s